Andrew Graham-Dixon Art critic, journalist, TV presenter, author, lecturer and educationalist.
Andrew Graham-Dixon Art critic, journalist, TV presenter, author, lecturer and educationalist.
Either type in a word or use the drop down options
TELEVISION / Back against the wall

Date: 27-10-1990
Owning Institution:
Publication: The Independent 1987 - 1999      
Subject:   20th Century    

Andrew Graham-Dixon on Omnibus's Tapies film

The grand old man of Spanish contemporary art, Antoni Tapies, came across on last night's Omnibus profile (BBC 2) as a man deeply at odds with his times. ''In our world,'' he intoned gravely, ''in which religious images are losing their meaning, in which our customs are getting more and more secular, we are losing our sense of the eternal. I think it's a loss that has done a great deal of damage to modern art''. His words hung enigmatically in the air.

This was a film shaped by the unqualified admiration of those who made it for their subject. Tapies' comments on himself and his work were allowed to stand unchallenged; his words, dubbed into English by Bob Peck, were the only ones heard for the duration of the programme. The Omnibus team, having tracked Tapies to his remote lair on the Costa Brava, seemed in awe of their prey. This translated into a film whose main thrust seemed anthropological, rather than critical or historical: Tapies, filmed in his own habitat, giving an account of himself with the minimum of outside intervention.

In his studio, Tapies attacked a canvas with a variety of brooms, brushes and gouging instruments. His techniques and his use of unconventional materials stemmed, he explained, from his desire to ''set traps for myself'' - these were ways of forcing himself to subordinate reason to the unconscious, the source of all inspiration. ''Painting,'' he announced, ''is a return to origins.'' The Omnibus team did a bit of getting back to origins themselves at this point. They filmed the thunderstorm which - the cutting suggested - was raging outside Tapies' studio while the maestro, possessed by his own elemental drives, agonised over the creative process indoors. This was the closest the film came to delivering a comment on its subject, and it came over as a whole-hearted endorsement of Tapies' mysticism: the artist as a surrogate for Mother Nature herself, driven by forces just as powerful and inexplicable.

There are other ways of looking at Tapies. He is, after all, something of a throwback: the assiduously cultivated automatism of his method recalls the experiments of the Surrealists (and of Miro, his most obvious forebear in Spanish art) to defeat reason, to untether the images they believed lurked in the unconscious; his faith in his own creativity as a virtually elemental force has its antecedent in Jackson Pollock's famous remark, ''I am nature''.

It was revealing to hear Tapies on his own iconography (the black crosses which scar his canvases, for example) and, too, to hear his unusual theory that men's destinies were shaped by their names. Tapies, he explained, is Spanish for wall, and his own paintings are inspired by the distressed, graffitised walls of the Gothic quarter of Barcelona. But it was a shame that this film made no attempt to place Tapies in anything other than the context of his own words and images. Maybe his name had exerted its mystical influence again; Tapies had been stonewalled.
 

Creative Common RightsAndrewGrahamDixon.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial - Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.