Date: 11-11-2007
Owning Institution: Palais des Beaux-Arts Lille
Publication:
Sunday Telegraph Reviews 2004-2010
Subject:
20th Century 19th Century 18th Century 17th Century 16th Century
Much fanfare has greeted the fact that when the new Eurostar terminal opens at St Pancras, in three days’ time, it will bring Paris even closer to London. What has been rather overlooked is that the grand old city of
The city has a vividly multicultural past. Over the centuries it has been ruled by the Normans and the Spanish, has been part of the great Burgundian empire and was once the capital of
Although its collections range from the Middle Ages to the beginnings of modern art, the museum itself is very much a child of the French Revolution and the years of the Napoleonic Empire. Anyone going to
The bulk of the riches thus assembled are displayed, today, in an elegant suite of high-ceilinged galleries on the first floor of the museum. The opening rooms are devoted to Flemish and Netherlandish art of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The Netherlandish Mannerist Jacob Jordaens is singularly well represented, there is an interesting School-of-Bruegel winter scene and the eye is also caught by a teeming depiction of A Bull Race in the Ruins of the Colosseum, by Martin van Heemskerck, fascinating master of topographical fantasies. But the undoubted highlight here is Rubens’s monumental Deposition of 1617, with its bright chromatic harmonies and startling blend of high artifice and raw emotion. The picture was originally a Franciscan commission, and reflects the Franciscan emphasis on the physical agonies of the crucifixion. On the ground at the foot of the cross, Rubens has painted the instruments of Christ’s torture – crown of thorns, bloodied nails, vinegar-soaked sponge – with an impressionistic lightness of touch. The body of the Saviour, shockingly blued by death, is lowered to the ground by a teetering pyramid of mourners, the most prominent of whom is Mary Magdalene. A sturdy, ale-fattened Flemish wench, with bright gold hair, she presses her tear-stained cheek to the ragged and bleeding perforation in his right hand. It is almost as if the whole signifcance of the scene has been distilled to this single, telling detail, spelling out a poignant contrast between the Magdalene’s health and beauty and the pathos of Christ’s death.
The Dutch galleries are also rich in masterpieces, including Jacob Ruisdael’s Wheat Field of 1660, which takes a scene of perfect inconsequentiality – a group of tiny figures, walking with a dog or two through some corner of Holland’s flat, fertile, high-skied landscape – and turns it into an unexpected idyll, the very image of a world sleepily at peace with itself. Emanuel de Witte’s Interior of the Nieuwe Kerk, of 1656, is a more strident assertion of the spirit of Dutch independence – a grandly assertive view of the white walls and whitewashed columns of a proudly Protestant place of worship, with the towering tomb of William of Orange at its centre. Pieter Codde’s Student in His Study is a wry study of a truculent young man, head propped on one hand in an attitude of self-conscious melancholy verging on outright bolshiness – vivid testament to the perennially vigorous discontent of the world’s student population.
The Spanish collection is smaller but also rich in memorable works, including some swirling, hallucinogenic El Grecos and a couple of singularly strange and dark Goyas. But perhaps the strongest of all the museum’s various clusters of galleries are those devoted to French Neoclassical and Romantic art. Here the visitor will find great paintings by Delacroix and Gericault, a whole wall covered with the vivid oil sketches of Louis-Leopold Boilly – one of the unsung masters of early nineteenth-century French portraiture – as well as Jacques-Louis David’s small but intense oil-sketch of Napoleon himself, one of the principal benefactors of the museum.
Here too hangs David’s presentation piece to the
Like all great museums, the Palais des Beaux-Arts repays frequent visits, but no whistlestop tour would be complete without a foray into the museum’s basement galleries. Here, at the end of an avenue formed by shattered fragments of religious statuary saved from the wreckage of
The subject of the bas-relief is the story of Salome. At the centre of the image, she dances her dance of the seven veils, watched impassively by an audience that seems weighed down by a sense of foreboding rather than aroused by the erotic display. To the left, a servant brings the head of John the Baptist to the banqueting table. The dinner guests grimace and frown, disgust etched into their faces, while Salome herself reels away from the consequences of her own actions. The figures and faces are intensely expressive, while the frieze-like composition suggests the influence of Roman sarcophagi. The work is one of a number of so-called schiacciato reliefs by Donatello, and represents not just a triumph of condensed, piercingly emotional narrative, but also a near-miracle of craftsmanship. Although it is a relief, not a painting, this is one of the very first Renaissance images constructed according to the rigorous principles of mathematically calculated perspective. Carved into a depth of no more than a centimetre of stone, the scene is set within a spatially convincing architecture – an architecture of steps and arcades and proliferated arches – which is so complex that it is possible to enumerate no fewer than nine progresssively receding layers of space within it.
Donatello’s Salome is also an object with a romantically intriguing provenance. It is recorded as having once been in the collections of Lorenzo de’ Medici – Lorenzo the Magnificent, who welcomed the young Michelangelo in his home, and encouraged him to study the many sculptures in the Medici collection. The work is indeed full of hints and suggestions that would be explored by the greatest sculptor of the High Renaissance in his own early work – the frieze-like composition, the poetic sense of narrative, even specific details like the steep flight of stairs carved in the subtlest light relief. The similarities are so compelling as to suggest that the later artist must have known and studied this particular work. So as well as being a window on to the world of the early Renaissance, this tablet of stone must once surely have been, so to speak, the young Michelangelo’s school-book.